New Trends in Logical Reasoning & Reading Comp

New Trends in Logical Reasoning & Reading Comp

Branden and Jelena share their thoughts on the Logical Reasoning and Reading Comp sections of newly released practice tests PT91 and PT92.

Show notes

This week’s episode decodes the Logical Reasoning and Reading Comprehension sections of newly released practice tests PT91 and PT92. Branden and Jelena share their thoughts on difficult questions and insights for future test takers.

This episode contains (or, is entirely composed of) spoilers for PT 91 and 92, so listeners who intend to take these PTs under realistic exam day conditions are advised to test before listening.

Listen and learn . . .

  1. Where have the Must Be Trues gone?
  2. Why are we seeing more Strengthen and Weaken questions in a single section?
  3. Why are Parallel Reasoning questions slowly disappearing?
  4. What can we expect for these sections on future tests?

Links and Further Resources from this Episode:


Start Your LSATMax Free Trial


Enroll in LSATMax's #1-Ranked LSAT Course


LSATMax's Private LSAT Tutoring


33 Common LSAT Flaws


Start Your 1L Free Trial Now (The Greatest Law School Supplement)


Start Your BarMax Free Trial Now


Apply Now for TestMax’s Justice in Action Program

Hosts

Jelena Woehr

Jelena Woehr

Jelena was born & raised in Golden, CO. There she cut her teeth on logic by getting into, then out of, an impressive amount of trouble. When not organizing student protests or lobbying the school board, Jelena competed in equestrian sports & constitutional debate. Jelena took the June 2017 LSAT, partly out of curiosity and partly because she developed a serious Logic Games addiction. After three months of study, Jelena achieved a score of 178. While she didn't end up falling in love with law school, she did find herself really enjoying the LSAT—so much that she left her previous career in tech startups behind and began teaching. Jelena prides herself on helping her students understand not just the systems and methods they can apply to get a good score, but the underlying logic & its applicability to the challenge of learning to think like a law student. Outside of her work with the LSAT, Jelena is a writer, creative content producer, & a competitive equestrian endurance rider.

Branden Frankel

Branden Frankel

In 2000, Branden graduated with a BA in Philosophy from UC Santa Barbara. For a few years after, he cast about in vain for entry-level philosopher positions, but, when he was visited by the Ghost of Student Loans Past, he knew it was time to make a change. In June 2006, Branden took the LSAT, scoring a 175. Thereafter, he attended UCLA School of Law, graduating in 2010 and practicing patent law for several years. Since 2013, he has taught dozens of live LSAT classes and tutored scores of successful test takers. When he's not considering the finer points of a particularly tricky Logical Reasoning question or kicking it with his daughter, Branden writes Science Fiction. You can find him after work at the local Starbucks, typing furiously, then deleting what he typed, then typing more, and so on for hours.


Guests

Subscribe now

Get new episodes of The Legal Level - LSAT, law school admissions, 1L, bar exam & more! automatically