Strengthening & Weakening: The Yin & Yang of the LSAT

Strengthening & Weakening: The Yin & Yang of the LSAT

Two of the most common question types on the LSAT are Strengthen and Weaken questions, and, while it may seem like you’re being asked to do opposite things for each, they share a core method, and what you learn about one applies to the other.

Show notes

Two of the most common question types on the LSAT are Strengthen and Weaken questions, and, while it may seem like you’re being asked to do opposite things for each, they share a core method, and what you learn about one applies to the other.

Listen as Jelena and Branden break down the best way to approach these questions.

In this episode, you’ll find out…

  1. How to put distracting information in the stimulus aside so you can focus on the argument
  2. How the makers of the LSAT think about strengthening and weakening arguments
  3. The difference between strengthening an argument and supporting a conclusion
  4. Tried and true ways to strengthen and weaken causal arguments
  5. How to anticipate correct answers
  6. How to make the best use of your knowledge of the 33 common LSAT flaws
  7. What makes wrong answers wrong
  8. What raising monarch butterflies has to do with strengthening and weakening arguments

Links and further resources from from this week’s episode:


Thinking of Adopting a Lepidopteran? Think Again: http://bit.ly/2NaqQIA


Sleep Deprivation and Dementia: http://bit.ly/3blBnZ8


LSAC Current Volume Summary Report: http://bit.ly/2MGEbIo


33 Common LSAT Flaws: https://amzn.to/3efTuzY


TestMax Announces Justice in Action Program to Support 1,000 Future Lawyers: https://testmaxprep.com/blog/justice-in-action


Start Your BarMax Free Trial Now: https://go.onelink.me/3011142272/d02ba2de


Start Your LSATMax Free Trial: https://go.onelink.me/z1Zu/689fb4b4


The Road to 180: The Ultimate Guide to LSAT Prep (free on Kindle unlimited): https://amzn.to/3q4ifp1

Hosts

Jelena Woehr

Jelena Woehr

Jelena was born & raised in Golden, CO. There she cut her teeth on logic by getting into, then out of, an impressive amount of trouble. When not organizing student protests or lobbying the school board, Jelena competed in equestrian sports & constitutional debate. Jelena took the June 2017 LSAT, partly out of curiosity and partly because she developed a serious Logic Games addiction. After three months of study, Jelena achieved a score of 178. While she didn't end up falling in love with law school, she did find herself really enjoying the LSAT—so much that she left her previous career in tech startups behind and began teaching. Jelena prides herself on helping her students understand not just the systems and methods they can apply to get a good score, but the underlying logic & its applicability to the challenge of learning to think like a law student. Outside of her work with the LSAT, Jelena is a writer, creative content producer, & a competitive equestrian endurance rider.

Branden Frankel

Branden Frankel

In 2000, Branden graduated with a BA in Philosophy from UC Santa Barbara. For a few years after, he cast about in vain for entry-level philosopher positions, but, when he was visited by the Ghost of Student Loans Past, he knew it was time to make a change. In June 2006, Branden took the LSAT, scoring a 175. Thereafter, he attended UCLA School of Law, graduating in 2010 and practicing patent law for several years. Since 2013, he has taught dozens of live LSAT classes and tutored scores of successful test takers. When he's not considering the finer points of a particularly tricky Logical Reasoning question or kicking it with his daughter, Branden writes Science Fiction. You can find him after work at the local Starbucks, typing furiously, then deleting what he typed, then typing more, and so on for hours.


Guests

Subscribe now

Get new episodes of The Legal Level - LSAT, law school admissions, 1L, bar exam & more! automatically